The researchers — led by Laila Akhu-Zaheya, PhD, RN, a health researcher at the Jordan University of Science and Technology in the Middle East — identified 434 records from two public hospitals to compare the quality of paper- and electronic-based nursing documentation.
They determined paper-based records boasted higher quality and quantity of content when compared to EHRs. By contrast, EHRs were more successful than paper-based records when it came to documentation process and structure.
The researchers concluded their study affirmed overall “poor quality” of nursing documentation.
“The study affirmed the poor quality of nursing documentation and lack of nurses’ knowledge and skills in the nursing process and its application in both paper-based and electronic-based system,” the study authors wrote. “Both forms of documentation revealed drawbacks in terms of content, process and structure.”
More articles on EHRs:
Cerner to extend free CommonWell interoperability services through 2020
HIMSS Analytics re-validates Nemours hospital’s Stage 7 designation
Do EHRs improve data sharing, daily workflow? Medical professionals weigh in
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.