Additionally, in an article in the January 2013 issue of Academic Medicine, researchers used financial planning software to model the annual finances of a physician and his or her family at various debt and income levels. According to the analysis:
“A primary care career remains financially viable for medical school graduates with median levels of education debt. Graduates pursuing primary care with higher debt levels need to consider additional strategies to support repayment such as extended repayment terms, use of a federal loan forgiveness/repayment program, or not living in the highest-cost areas.”
Thus, according to the findings, physicians with median debt levels ($160,000-$170,000) can afford to pursue primary care while living in an urban area and raising a family. Physicians with higher debt ($250,000 or more) will need to think carefully about repayment choices during residency and beyond.
So, I suppose I need to admit that my initial thinking about debt and income influencing a decision not to pursue primary care was wrong. However, I still think medical education is incredibly expensive, and while analysis shows that entering the lowest paying specialty at a median debt level is doable, monthly loan repayments could reach into the several thousand dollars for some students, a sizeable chunk of a monthly budget.
Perhaps the most important decision physicians will make then, at least financially, is not whether to go to med school, but where to go to med school, considering the cost of attendance (tuition + cost of living – financial aid) as key factor in their decision.