“Selecting the right hospital to receive care can save your life, lower your risks of getting a complication or even reduce your financial hardship,” Dr. Pronovost, the director of the Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality and senior vice president for patient safety and quality for Baltimore-based Johns Hopkins Medicine. “The problem is that it’s extremely hard for patients to make that judgment.”
That’s because the data is either difficult to find and interpret or isn’t available to the public at all, according to Dr. Pronovost. Additionally, data comes from several sources, like the government, payers, ratings companies and journalism outlets, which can provide conflicting information.
He called for healthcare to put something similar to the Federal Accounting Standards Board in place. The FASB “sets requirements for the reporting of financial data,” he wrote.
“For the sake of patients and healthcare organizations, we need a FASB-like body to provide [a] book of truth and help develop measures that matter to patients,” Dr. Pronovost concluded.
More articles on quality measures:
CMS, AHIP release first core measures for quality-based payments: 5 things to know
Using a multi-pronged approach to fix hospital culture and improve patient safety
In pay-for-performance, are hospitals unfairly penalized for patient hardships?
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.