The initial lawsuit from 2014 alleges that Aetna’s recovery policies yielded plaintiffs without plan benefits they were entitled to because they were diverted to cover an overpayment from another plan.
The court ruled that these actions and others amounted to cross-plan offsetting practices, trumping Aetna’s claims that their actions were permitted under state law.
The court also ruled in favor of the plaintiffs’ call for a pro rata calculation to determine benefits due, which the judge allowed due to Aetna’s holding of benefits in a pooled bank account.
As of the date of the issued opinion, Aetna has 21 days to amend its counterclaim on the matter.
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.