In a filing with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, the BCBS Association said Pittsburgh-based UPMC is years late in its attempt to intervene in the civil antitrust case. The first among nine similar cases that were consolidated in the multidistrict litigation was from 2012.
“UPMC’s motion to intervene at this stage after the close of discovery and despite UPMC’s years-long knowledge of the litigation, would significantly delay the adjudication of the existing parties’ rights,” the filing stated, as cited by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
In addition to the petition to intervene in the case, UPMC is also requesting a preliminary injunction that would halt a BCBS prohibition against plans networking with hospitals outside their service areas, according to the report. A preliminary injunction would essentially make UPMC out of network with much of the BCBS network, according to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Plaintiffs in the BCBS antitrust lawsuit can object or support UPMC’s petition to intervene in the case by March 14.
More articles on payers:
Minnesota senate passes bill to continue subsidies for health insurers
Humana settles pregnancy discrimination lawsuit
Humana debuts bundled payment model for spinal fusions
Becker’s 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit is the top tier event that the people leading the future of pharmacy convene. This 3-day event is built specifically for Chief Pharmacy Officers and senior pharmacy leaders. The sessions examine the workforce, financial and clinical priorities shaping pharmacy today. Becker’s is where candid discussions flourish and new ideas thrive. Becker's 3rd Annual Fall Chief Pharmacy Officer Summit
