The Anti-Injunction Act, an 1867 federal law, requires cases aimed at curbing a tax to be heard only after the tax is implemented. The individual mandate will take effect in 2014 and the penalties for noncompliance will be paid on federal tax returns in 2015. Thus, if the court rules the Anti-Injunction Act applies, this week’s three-day schedule of hearings against the law would have to be postponed until 2015.
Both the Obama administration and the reform law’s opponents maintain that the payment for rejecting the individual mandate is a penalty and not a tax for the purposes of the Anti-Injunction Act. However, as a federal appeals court ruled in favor of the act last year, the Supreme Court appointed Robert A. Long to serve as an outside lawyer to argue for the Anti-Injunction Act.
More Articles on Healthcare Reform:
Supreme Court Begins 3-Day Marathon of Healthcare Reform Oral Arguments
Healthcare Reform’s Day in Court: 7 Experts Weigh-In
Healthcare Reform: Two Years Gone, Now What’s on the Horizon?
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.