In a Jan. 13 news release, the hospital said U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor ordered both parties to attempt to arbitrate most of the lawsuit, but stayed some portions of the suit pending the arbitration outcome. By staying some portions of the lawsuit, Knox County Hospital District can pursue any legal claims against BCBS that aren’t resolved in arbitration.
In the lawsuit, Knox County Hospital argued BCBS of Texas owed the hospital unpaid claims. Court replies from BCBS of Texas argue that the hospital actually owes the insurer money, and isn’t entitled to payment on disputed claims. BCBS of Texas argues it was billed for patients who hadn’t actually accessed services at Knox County Hospital.
“We’re pleased to have the option of coming back to court if we are unable to resolve some of the serious financial hardships that have been imposed on the Knox County Hospital. We want the citizens of Knox County to be fully covered before this [issue] is resolved,” said Kelly Dawson, attorney for the hospital, in a news release.
BCBS of Texas told Becker’s the insurer can’t comment because of pending litigation.
More articles on legal and regulatory issues:
South Carolina hospital escapes suit over physician’s lack of adequate insurance
Feds recovered $2.6B from healthcare fraud cases in 2019
CHS reaches $53M deal in class-action stock drop lawsuit
At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.