Supreme Court Rules Information Gained by Freedom of Information Act Not Eligible for False Claims Action

The Supreme Court has ruled that information gained by Freedom of Information Act requests cannot be used as the basis for False Claims whistleblower lawsuits, according to an AHA News Now report.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court overturned at lower court’s decision in Schindler Elevator v. US ex rel. Kirk, determining that “information obtained through a FOIA request cannot provide the basis for the personal knowledge private individuals must have to pursue an FCA case,” according to the report.

The False Claims Act has long included a public disclosure bar, and the recent decision sets a precedent that an FOIA request can trigger the bar. Essentially, the Court said FOIA-obtained information cannot be substituted for first-hand knowledge needed to bring False Claims cases.

The American Hospital Association filed an amicus brief opposing the lower court’s decision.

Read the AHA News Now report on the False Claims Act.

Related Articles on the False Claims Act:
10 Recent Stark, False Claims and Kickback Lawsuits Involving Hospitals and Health Systems
12 False Claims and Fraud Lawsuits Involving Physicians

At Becker's 4th Annual CEO + CFO Roundtable, taking place November 2–5 in Chicago, more than 1,500 hospital and health system executives tackle decisions that determine whether organizations thrive or merely survive: protecting margins under cost pressure, choosing where to grow, renegotiating payer relationships, stabilizing the workforce and proving real ROI on technology. This is where leaders work through them together, face-to-face. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Leadership & Management

Advertisement

Comments are closed.