Supreme Court Could Uphold Healthcare Mandate

Although the Supreme Court has been shifting rightward, there are signs it might not strike down the healthcare law’s mandate to buy insurance when it is expected to review lower court decisions both for and against the provision, according to a report by the Washington Post.

Advertisement

 

Charles Fried, former administration solicitor general for President Reagan, said he was “quite sure” the mandate is constitutional and did not believe Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. would support opponents’ arguments. “I don’t see Roberts as going for this tea party stuff,” he said. He cited a recent Supreme Court decision to support his view.

 

Mr. Fried disagreed with Georgetown law professor Randy Barnett, who said forcing citizens to buy insurance was an “unprecedented” abuse of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Two federal judges have held that opinion so far, while two others have upheld the law.

 

Read the Washington Post report on healthcare reform.

 

Read more coverage of court decisions on the healthcare reform law:

 

For First Time, Judge Strikes Down Entire Reform Law

 

Michigan Hospital Executives Concerned about Removing Insurance Mandate

 

Obama Administration Will Appeal Judge’s Rejection of Individual Mandate

At Becker's 4th Annual CEO + CFO Roundtable, taking place November 2–5 in Chicago, more than 1,500 hospital and health system executives tackle decisions that determine whether organizations thrive or merely survive: protecting margins under cost pressure, choosing where to grow, renegotiating payer relationships, stabilizing the workforce and proving real ROI on technology. This is where leaders work through them together, face-to-face. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Leadership & Management

Advertisement

Comments are closed.