What Hackensack Meridian built to earn the nation’s 1st AI certification

Advertisement

Hackensack Meridian Health’s path to becoming the first health network in the nation to earn The Joint Commission’s Responsible Use of AI in Healthcare Certification began years before the accrediting organization launched the program. 

The health system announced the certification July 29, about seven weeks after the Joint Commission introduced the voluntary program June 1.

The Edison, N.J.-based health system had already established multidisciplinary governance structures to evaluate AI technologies, according to Joel Klein, MD, executive vice president and chief digital and information officer.

“It’s not an overnight thing,” Dr. Klein told Becker’s.

The Joint Commission certification evaluates healthcare organizations across areas including AI governance and oversight, patient privacy, risk and bias assessment, ongoing monitoring, transparency and staff training.

For Hackensack Meridian, the review resembled other Joint Commission survey processes, Dr. Klein said. Surveyors held numerous sessions with the organization, conducted tracers with staff members and reviewed documentation outlining how the health system evaluates AI tools for factors such as safety and efficacy. They also examined contracts.

“They wanted to look at everything,” he said, describing the process as comprehensive and credible.

Hackensack Meridian’s AI governance efforts began years earlier as the technology started gaining traction in healthcare. Rather than leaving decisions to a small technology team, the health system assembled leaders from across the organization to evaluate proposed AI technologies and consider whether they could safely improve care, maintain appropriate clinician involvement and be defended to patients and their families.

Dr. Klein estimated that dozens of people participate in AI governance and monitoring at Hackensack Meridian to varying degrees, including program managers who coordinate reviews and senior leaders who weigh in on individual technologies.

That governance also extends beyond AI tools that directly influence clinical care.

While clinical AI may appear to warrant greater scrutiny than administrative applications, Dr. Klein said seemingly back-office technologies can also create risks for patients. An improperly deployed tool could, for example, result in incorrect supplies being ordered or interfere with a patient’s relationship with an insurer.

For CIOs building their own AI governance programs, Dr. Klein pointed to three priorities.

First, governance should be multidisciplinary rather than controlled by one or two decision-makers. At Hackensack Meridian, that includes input from compliance, legal, clinical, academic and nursing leaders, physicians and patient and family perspectives.

Second, health systems should develop an objective framework for evaluating AI technologies, such as a scoring rubric, rather than relying solely on individual judgment.

“Don’t just eyeball it. Don’t keep it subjective,” Dr. Klein said. A standardized approach can help organizations evaluate technologies more consistently as the number and types of AI tools continue to expand.

Third, health systems need clear expectations for how technology vendors can use patient information.

“You’ve got to remember that it’s not your data; it’s the patient’s data,” Dr. Klein said.

He said health systems should carefully scrutinize vendor requests for long-term access to patient data, including requests to use information to improve or commercialize their products. Although some arrangements may be appropriate with sufficient safeguards, health systems should establish what uses they are willing to permit before signing contracts.

That discipline can become more difficult as clinicians and health system leaders push to adopt rapidly advancing technologies, Dr. Klein said. Healthcare professionals often see technologies that could potentially improve outcomes or reduce administrative burdens and understandably want access to them quickly.

But speed should not override governance, he said.

“If we just deploy something because of the perceived urgency, eventually you’re going to make a big mistake,” Dr. Klein said.

At the Becker's 11th Annual IT + Revenue Cycle Conference: The Future of AI & Digital Health, taking place September 14–17 in Chicago, healthcare executives and digital leaders from across the country will come together to explore how AI, interoperability, cybersecurity, and revenue cycle innovation are transforming care delivery, strengthening financial performance, and driving the next era of digital health. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Digital Health

Advertisement