Study Reveals Shortfalls in Hospital Boards' Involvement in Quality Efforts
The study combined survey data of hospital governance collected by The Governance Institute with hospital performance data drawn from AHRQ and CMS. In total, 13 hospital board practices were examined in the TGI survey. An analysis of those practices revealed some practices are directly associated with improved hospital performance. Those practices include:
• Requiring major new clinical programs to meet quality-related criteria
• Setting some quality goals at the "theoretical ideal" level
• Requiring both the board and the medical staff to be as involved as management in setting the agenda for discussion on quality
• Requiring the hospital to issue public quality/safety performance reports
The most commonly adopted was regular review of the hospital's quality performance. Ninety-six percent of the responding hospitals conducted such reviews at least once a year.
However, the researchers suggested some areas of weakness as well. For example, only 60 percent of the responding hospitals had a board committee focused specifically on quality. In addition, less than 40 percent of the responding hospitals reported their quality/safety performance to the general public. Another area for improvement is engagement of physician leadership in both oversight activities and quality improvement efforts.
Related Articles on Hospital Quality:Massachusetts Medicaid Pay-for-Performance Failed to Improve Quality in First Year
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2016. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.
To receive the latest hospital and health system business and legal news and analysis from Becker's Hospital Review, sign-up for the free Becker's Hospital Review E-weekly by clicking here.