In the brief, the hospital association argues the state mistakenly relied on one measure — the amount of free care provided — to determine whether the clinic’s parent organization should qualify for a property tax exemption.
In its brief, the OHA takes issue with the state’s interpretation of “charitable” for the purpose of charitable-property tax exemptions and also argues the state did not consider all appropriate factors in determining whether Dialysis Clinic qualified for the exemption.
Read the AHA News story on and download a copy of the Ohio Hospital Association‘s amicus brief.
