Viewpoint: Why hospital mergers raise patient safety problems

Megan Knowles - Print  | 

Although hospitals and health systems often cite the pursuit of "better patient care" as reason for mergers or acquisitions with one another, research shows partnerships and transactions might put patients at a higher risk for harm in the short term, three authors write in an op-ed published by STAT.

Hospitals can improve patient safety during mergers and affiliations, but they must make intentional efforts to ensure patients receive the best care in a deal's aftermath, the authors argue.

Here are six insights from the op-ed, written by Susan Haas, MD, co-principal investigator for Boston-based healthcare solutions firm Ariadne Labs' work on reducing patient safety risks with health system expansion, and William Berry, MD, associate director and senior adviser at Ariadne Labs and Mark Reynolds, president and CEO of CRICO/Risk Management Foundation:

1. Since 2014, there have been over 100 hospital or health system mergers and acquisitions across the U.S., with a high of 115 M&As in 2017. "Although much is known about the financial impact of hospital and health system mergers and acquisitions, we know almost nothing about how they affect patient care or patient safety," the authors write.

2. The authors note how merger talks often start with network development leaders opposed to leaders with a background in medicine, and clinicians are rarely included in the process early on. "It's usually not until after the deal has been completed that [clinicians] are asked to work out the necessary arrangements to fill gaps and coordinate and standardize clinical care," the authors write. "That's too late."

3. As part of their ongoing research, the authors polled physicians in their research group whose practices were involved in a merger or acquisition. They interviewed more than 70 clinicians (mostly physicians) and business staff involved in network development to assess whether patient safety risks happen due to system expansion.

4. After hearing several stories involving risks to patient safety, the authors identified three key sources of risk: 

5. The authors have developed several free toolkits and created a guide for clinical and nonclinical leaders. "We believe that such variations arise normally and are not in themselves a problem. But they can become a problem when they are not surfaced and addressed before physicians are assigned to new settings," the authors write.

6. The authors now plan to focus on developing tools to (a) support clinicians when they are deployed to new institutions and (b) help minimize difficulties transferring patients between hospitals within a network when the patient's condition changes.

"There are no signs that the pace of hospital and health system mergers and acquisitions will slow," the authors write. "Incorporating early, clinician-led evaluation of the potential patient safety risks from system expansion is a practice every health care system should incorporate into its planning process."

More articles on clinical leadership and infection control: 
Asthma outcomes may improve with text-message communication, study suggests
Massachusetts hospital cited for lapses in high-risk pregnancy care
Viewpoint: Do physicians have a duty to 'keep tabs' on their sickest patients?

© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2019. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.

To receive the latest hospital and health system business and legal news and analysis from Becker's Hospital Review, sign-up for the free Becker's Hospital Review E-weekly by clicking here.