KLAS’ report, “Clinical Decision Support 2011: Understanding the Impact,” includes responses from 344 providers on their CDS tools’ effect on clinical decisions and standardizing care. Results showed that most CDS tools performed well in one of these areas but rarely in both, according to the release. Respondents also noted a drawback of CDS tools was alert fatigue.
Related Articles on Clinical Decision Support:
Study: Clinical Decision Support Associated With Better Outcomes
Improving Cost-Efficiency, Safety in Hospitals via Imaging Clinical Decision Support
HIMSS, mHealth Regulatory Coalition Submit Comments to FDA on Mobile Medical Apps
