Human-AI collaboration more effective than either working alone: Stanford study

Andrea Park - Print  | 

When the work of radiologists is augmented with artificial intelligence, the results outperform those of both radiologists and AI working independently, a recent study led by researchers from Stanford (Calif.) University School of Medicine found.

The study, which was published in npj Digital Medicine and also included collaborators from Durham, N.C.-based Duke University Medical Center and Unanimous AI, compared the accuracy of two deep learning models, a group of expert radiologists and a combination of the two when tasked with diagnosing pneumonia from chest radiographs.

While the AI models were found to outperform the humans when each worked separately, a combined "human-in-the-loop" model was found to produce the greatest diagnostic accuracy of all, by "harnessing the advantages of both while at the same time overcoming their respective limitations," according to the report.

"The clinical significance of this could imply that, in a landscape of increasing clinical volumes, complexity of cases and medical record documentation, physicians could leverage deep learning to improve operational efficiency," the study's authors wrote, while "deep learning algorithms could provide automated rapid diagnosis for high-confidence cases as a triage tool, so that physicians could spend less time on high-confidence cases evaluated by an AI model and more time on relatively complex cases."

More articles on AI:
AI predicts seizures 1 hour before onset with 99.6% accuracy, study finds
Novartis launches program with Biofourmis for AI monitoring of heart failure patients
AI to have major effects on better-paid, higher-educated workers: 5 things to know

© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2020. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.