Bipartisan Bill Would Repeal Medicare Hospital Payment Loophole
Under Section 3141, the Medicare hospital wage index is adjusted so that a state's urban hospitals must be reimbursed for wages paid to physicians and staff at least as much as rural hospitals. These reimbursements for hospital wages also come from a national pool of money, meaning that if one state receives higher Medicare wages, it will come at the expense of another state.
In January, 20 state hospital associations — Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin — as well as the National Rural Health Association wrote a letter (pdf) to the White House arguing this provision is decimating their Medicare reimbursements.
A Boston Globe report found that Massachusetts had received an estimated $367 million in additional Medicare funding due to Section 3141 because the state's only rural hospital — Nantucket (Mass.) Cottage Hospital, based in an affluent area with a high cost of living — set an inordinately high floor for wage reimbursements. In total, nine states received higher Medicare wages under the provision, while the remaining 41 lost Medicare funds.
Sens. McCaskill and Coburn called the provision "unfair" and said it only benefited hospitals in some states to the disadvantage of many others.
More Articles on Medicare and Hospitals:
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2015. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies by clicking here.
To receive the latest hospital and health system business and legal news and analysis from Becker's Hospital Review, sign-up for the free Becker's Hospital Review E-weekly by clicking here.
New From Becker's Hospital CFO